Rohde is the perfect - 16:13, 14/10/2015

Rohde is the perfect potesr girl for a feminist run state. Nominally Chief of Police, she talks and acts like Chief Social Worker instead in an Orwellian world. Well aware of the Muslim factor in local rape, she lies to the public about it (as do Lars Hedegaard's prosecutors). Instead of confronting the darkness her feminist left wing government masters continue to import (and undoubtedly forfeiting her career if she did), she's a good little denialist for the State. She decides to address the pimple of date rape by Norwegian native men and let the giant sucking wound of Muslim rape fester in the darkness of public ignorance. Big Nanny will never admit it got things terribly wrong. It just keeps adding wrongs to cover up and women turn out to be no better moral agents than men as custodians of the public good, their massive self-regard to the contrary. Leftist women run what they claim to be a "more humane" society that in reality pampers predators at the expense of innocents (ironically, mostly women). How is this morally justifiable and how on earth does the Left's high opinion of itself remain impervious to its own hypocrisy, blind to the body counts they cause? But then, throughout history, they have refused to admit "inconveniences" to their world view: a hundred million dead of communist gulags and starvation, millions needlessly dead of malaria in Africa due to DDT junk science, two million dead in communist killing fields post Vietnam, 800,000 black Rwandans hacking each other to death and 500,000 black Sudanese slaughtered by Muslims. What are mere crime stats to such a heavyweight class of willful ignorers and ignoramuses?