Deprecated: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /var/www/soeg.nu/public_html/classes/db.class.php on line 11
Advokater : Odense C : Merete Vangsøe Simonsen | Søg.nu

Advokat.søg.nu

Søg.nu logo

Advokater i Danmark

Advokat i Århus, København, Aalborg, Esbjerg, Vejle, Roskilde, Odense, Randers, Kolding, Horsens...

Advokat Odense C:


Merete Vangsøe Simonsen

Englandsgade 25
5000 Odense C


Tlf: 63 14 20 20

Hvis du har tilføjelser eller rettelser vedr. Merete Vangsøe Simonsen i Odense C er du velkommen til at sende en mail til Soeg.nu med opdaterede oplysninger.

BEMÆRK - Du kan IKKE sende personlige beskeder til Merete Vangsøe Simonsen direkte via ovenstående mail-adresse. Alle mails, der ikke vedrører opdateringer eller manglende / forkerte oplysninger, slettes omgående og bliver ikke besvaret.

Venlig hilsen
Soeg.nu

Har du erfaring med Merete Vangsøe Simonsen kan du her tilføje kommentar / review / anmeldelse / bedømmelse. Vi forbeholder os retten til at fjerne useriøse / upassende indlæg.

I am in no way sugge - 09:24, 19/12/2015

I am in no way suggesting that you suohld try to dissuade thieves, robbers, murderers, and oath-breakers with words. But I do suggest that it is helpful to gather support from those around you who are not any of these things before you go into battle. And, if it can be accomplished, after the battle has been joined. As it stands, I could not lend my full support to the Counter-Jihad because it appears to despise some principles that I've put my life on the line to defend. You might consider that a small loss...and you might be right. But I'm willing to bet that there are millions of others who will hesitate to associate themselves with an organization that seems open to the charges of racism and bigotry hurled against it.I believe that there are two criteria that need to be met with regards to lethal force (and thus--implicitly--all government actions, since government is always ultimately backed with the threat or actual use of lethal force). First, it must be lawful. That is to say, you must only use lethal force against a person that has already committed a crime. Second, it must be moral. Meaning that you suohld only take a life in order to save lives.In the second consideration, whether an exercise in force is moral, it does matter why someone has committed a crime that makes them lawfully subject to a potential lethal response. It is common to recognize that a crime committed for "unique" reasons could make it immoral to apply the full penalty justified by the law. But the law itself suohld only be concerned with the first criteria, what actual actions were committed.This is a fundamental principle of law, and a fundamental distinction between law and morality. In morality, we might give forgiveness (a positive good) to one that the law has condemned. In law, we administer punishment (the law is capable of nothing else) to those that transgress. Morality concerns itself with doing good to others, law with when we are justified in doing evil to them. These two fundamentally different systems need to be kept distinct.Well, that is overly philosophical. The point about equality before the law can be made much more simply if we consider that it is impossible to absolutely know the secret heart of another person. Of particular significance, in Islam it is perfectly acceptable for "good Muslims" to deny their own faith before infidels as a way of evading "persecution".And I have to say, prosecuting people differently based on their religious profession is a form of persecution that doesn't even need scare quotes.I may think that Christianity is the best opposition to Islam (I'm actually undecided on the point, for certain definitions of "best"). But I don't really favor bringing in religious arguments for a number of pragmatic reasons. One of which is that using Christianity as a cultural weapon to obliterate other religions isn't exactly Christian. Christ and His disciples taught that membership in the kingdom was for those willing to sacrifice all else for it. While it is not any cause for rejoicing that some cannot give away all else for Christ, there is no virtue in forced conversion (which is one of the notable differences between Islam and Christianity, Islam inherently grants that forced conversions do have value even if it admits that value to be less than free conversion).Continued...

Navn


Kommentar


Sikkerheds kode
=

Du har ikke installeret flash eller du har ikke aktiveret Java.

Vælg region ved at klikke på kortet